LLH401 - Screen Reader Versions

• Beissner, K. L., Jonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. L. (1994). Using and Selecting Graphic Techniques to Acquire Structural Knowledge. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 7(4), 20–38. doi:10.1111/j.1937-8327.1994.tb00648.x

• Bott, B., & Talbot-Stokes, R. (2012). Chapter 5: Secondary Sources. In Nemes and Coss’ effective legal research (5th ed, pp. 112–271). Chatswood, N.S.W.: LexisNexis Butterworths. Download
  

• Bryan A. Garner, Jeff Newman, & Tiger Jackson. (2006). Chapter 19 Affidavits and Declarations. In The Redbook : a manual on legal style (2nd ed., pp. 375–382). Thomson/West. Download
  

• Bryson, B. (1991). Mother tongue: the English language (pp. 134–146). London: Penguin. Download
  

• Coleman, P. (2006). Chapter 8: Protracted Conflicts as Dynamical Systems. In The negotiator’s fieldbook (pp. 61–73). Washington, DC: American Bar Association, Section of Dispute Resolution. Download
  

• Fraser, S. W., & Greenhalgh, T. (2001). Complexity science: Coping with complexity: educating for capability. BMJ, 323(7316), 799–803. doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7316.799

• Gannage, M. (1999). How to Structure Your Legal Memorandum. Perspectives:Teaching Legal Research and Writing, 8(1), 30–33. Retrieved from http://info.legalsolutions.thomsonreuters.com/pdf/perspec/1999-fall/1999-fall-11.pdf

• Gantt, L. (2007). Deconstructing Thinking Like a Lawyer: Analyzing the Cognitive Components of the Analytical Mind. Campbell Law Review, 29(3), 413–482. Retrieved from http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/camplr29&id=441

• Garner, B. (2013). Garner, B. (2013). Lentini v. California Center for the Arts. In The Redbook : A Manual on Legal Style (3rd ed., pp. 375–382). West Academic Publishing. Download
  

• Garner, B. A. (2002). The elements of legal style (2nd ed, pp. 15–28). New York: Oxford University Press. Download
  

• Helene Shapo. (n.d.). Chapter 10: Sentence Structure. In Writing and Analysis in the Law (pp. 229–248). New York: Foundation Press. Download.
  

• Jonassen, D. H. (n.d.). Learning to Solve Problems: An Instructional Design Guide. Retrieved from http://www-tandfonline-com.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/doi/abs/10.1080/15332276.2009.11673538

• Judy Steiner-Williams. (2014, August 5). Grammar Foundations. Retrieved from https://www.lynda.com/Business-Skills-tutorials/Welcome/158318/184585-4.html?srchtrk=index%3a3%0alinktypeid%3a2%0aq%3agrammar+fundamentals%0apage%3a1%0as%3arelevance%0asa%3atrue%0aproducttypeid%3a2

• Kelton, C. (2015). Clients Want Results, Lawyers Need Emotional Intelligence. Cleveland State Law Review, 63(2), 459–494. Retrieved from http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/clevslr63&id=469

• Kosuri, P. (2015). Beyond Gilson: The Art of Business Lawyering. Lewis & Clark Law Review, 19(2), 463–496. Retrieved from http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/lewclr19&id=479

• Mapping Legal Research. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/includes/remote_people_profile/remote_staff_profile?sq_content_src=%2BdXJsPWh0dHAlM0ElMkYlMkZ3d3cyLmxhdy5lZC5hYy51ayUyRmZpbGVfZG93bmxvYWQlMkZwdWJsaWNhdGlvbnMlMkYwXzE4NjBfbWFwcGluZ2xlZ2FscmVzZWFyY2gucGRmJmFsbD0x

• Murphy, P. (2001). Teaching Evidence, Proof, and Facts: Providing a Background in Factual Analysis and Case Evaluation. Journal of Legal Education, 51(4), 568–598. Retrieved from http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/jled51&id=578

• Neumann, R. K., Margolis, E., & Stanchi, K. M. (2017). Chapter 21 Effective Style in Legal reasoning and legal writing (8th ed., Vol. Aspen coursebook series). New York, NY: Wolters Kluwer. Download
  

• Parker, C. (2004). A Critical Morality for Lawyers: Four Approaches to Lawyers’ Ethics. Monash University Law Review, 30(1), 49–74. Retrieved from http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/monash30&id=61

• Patel, S. (2014). Cultural Competency Training: Preparing Law Students for Practice in Our Multicultural World. UCLA Law Review Discourse, (62), 139–156. Retrieved from http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/ucladis62&id=139

• Shapo, Helene S. (2008). Chapter 10: Sentence Structure. In Writing and Analysis in the Law (5th ed., pp. 229–248). Foundation Press. Download
  

• Stark, T. (2004). Thnking Like a Deal Lawyer. Journal of Legal Education, 54(2), 223–234. Retrieved from http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/jled54&id=233

• Thomas S. Kane. (n.d.). Chapter 18 pp.111-118; Chapter 20 pp.140-146; Chapter 23 pp.171-174; Chapter 25 pp.190-202. In The New Oxford Guide to Writing. Oxford University Press, USA. Download
  

• Vinson, K. (2015). What’s Your Problem. Stetson Law Review, 44(3), 777–830. Retrieved from http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/stet44&id=815

• 385 — Statutes > (2) INTERPRETATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF STATUTES, Halsbury’s Laws of Australia. Ensure that you are logged into QUT to access this reading. Retrieved from https://advance.lexis.com/document/documentslider?crid=0f7eb76d-1f4e-415d-b0e9-f524f2d4ec1f&pdpermalink=1936a7f5-e49e-4448-aa42-36544c386f3d&pdmfid=1201008&pdisurlapi=true

  Burns, K., & Hutchinson, T. (2009). The impact of ‘empirical facts’ on legal scholarship and legal research training. The Law Teacher, 43(2), 153–178. doi:10.1080/03069400903004236

  Byers, S. M. (1998). Should the High Court Consider Policy Implications in Deciding Cases? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 57(1), 70–72. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.1998.tb01366.x

  Cook v  Cook (1986) 162 CLR 376 at 390. Retrieved from http://www.westlaw.com.au/maf/wlau/app/document?docguid=I42144550e2a911e08eefa443f89988a0&epos=5&tocDs=AUNZ_AU_JOURNALS_TOC&isTocNav=true&startChunk=1&endChunk=1

  Dyson Heydon. (n.d.). Judicial activism and the death of the rule of law. Quadrant, 47(1), 9–22. Retrieved from http://search.informit.com.au.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/documentSummary;res=AGISPT;issn=0033-5002;py=2003;vol=47;iss=1;spage=9

  Edited by Peter Cane and Herbert M. Kritzer. (n.d.-a). Qualitative Approaches to Empirical Legal Research. In The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research. Retrieved from http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199542475.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199542475-e-39

  Edited by Peter Cane and Herbert M. Kritzer. (n.d.-b). Quantitative Approaches to Empirical Legal Research. In The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research. Retrieved from http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199542475.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199542475-e-38

  Foley, B. J.; Robbins, R. (2001). Fiction 101: A Primer for Lawyers on How to Use Fiction Writing Techniques to Write Persuasive Facts Sections. Rutgers Law Journal, 32(2), 459–484. Retrieved from http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/rutlj32&id=485

  Jensen, D. (2011). Theories, Principles, Policies and Common Law Adjudication. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, (36), 34–57. Retrieved from http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/ajlph36&id=38

  John Basten. (2010). International Influences on Domestic Law: Neither Jingoistic Exceptionalism nor Blind Servility - NSW Bar Association Lecture Series. Retrieved from http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/NSWJSchol/2010/8.html

  John Seely. (2013a). Chapter 25: Planning and Drafting in Oxford Guide to Effective Writing and Speaking : How to Communicate Clearly. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/qut/reader.action?docID=1591556&ppg=348

  John Seely. (2013b). Chapter 8: Essays Papers and Dissertations in Oxford Guide to Effective Writing and Speaking : How to Communicate Clearly. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/qut/reader.action?docID=1591556&ppg=7#ppg=106

  Kirby, M. (n.d.). Precedent law, practice and trends in Australia — (2007) 28 Aust Bar Rev 243. Retrieved from https://advance.lexis.com/document/?pdmfid=1201008&crid=a5544325-0fdb-40a9-a2e1-9870ba7b5dc2&pddocfullpath=%2Fshared%2Fdocument%2Fanalytical-materials-au%2Furn%3AcontentItem%3A5900-7561-F5T5-M03T-00000-00&pdtocnodeidentifier=ABVAACAAB&ecomp=nfnhk&prid=ae2056c8-a607-488f-81a9-4ecc5b85d53b

  Michael Kirby. (1993). Courts and Policy: The Exciting Australian Scene. Commonwealth Law Bulletin, 19(4), 1794–1811. Retrieved from http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/commwlb19&id=1870

  Michael Kirby. (n.d.-a). The Internationalisation of Domestic Law and Its Consequences. Bar News: Journal of the NSW Bar Association, 107(25). Retrieved from http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/NSWBarAssocNews/2010/25.html

  Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (2016) 90 ALJR 835, 840-2 (per French CJ). Retrieved from https://advance.lexis.com/document/?pdmfid=1201008&crid=43875894-30de-4fbc-80d1-02e1e1847fd4&pddocfullpath=%2Fshared%2Fdocument%2Fcases-au%2Furn%3AcontentItem%3A5KB2-D7Y1-JP9P-G4CS-00000-00&pddocid=urn%3AcontentItem%3A5KB2-D7Y1-JP9P-G4CS-00000-00&pdcontentcomponentid=267716&pdshepid=urn%3AcontentItem%3A5KB2-D7Y1-JP9P-G4CS-00000-00&pdteaserkey=sr1&pdicsfeatureid=1517127&ecomp=-8ttk&earg=sr1&prid=f8c68a0e-880e-4455-84eb-f364feb86835

  Palmer, A. (2014). Chapter 7: Arguing from and about evidence. In Proof: How to Analyse Evidence in Preparation for Trial (3rd edition, pp. 89–132). Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Education Australia. Download
  

  Parina Patel. (2009a). Introduction to Quantitative Methods [in Law]’ - Empirical Law Seminar. Retrieved from http://hls.harvard.edu/content/uploads/2011/12/quantitative_methods.pdf

  Paul Chynoweth. (2009). Legal Research. In Advanced Research Methods in the Built Environment. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated. Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/qut/reader.action?docID=428192

  Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex Parte Lam (2003) 214 CLR 1. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.westlaw.com.au/maf/wlau/app/document?docguid=Ib61e94749d6511e0a619d462427863b2&epos=1&tocDs=AUNZ_AU_JOURNALS_TOC&isTocNav=true&startChunk=1&endChunk=1

  Robert French. (2009b). International law and Australian domestic law - Supreme Court of NSW Annual Conference. Retrieved from http://www.hcourt.gov.au/assets/publications/speeches/current-justices/frenchcj/frenchcj21aug09.pdf

  Ronald Sackville. (2005). Courts and social change., 33(3), 373–390. Retrieved from http://search.informit.com.au.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/documentSummary;res=AGISPT;dn=20060620

  Roxborough v Rothmans of Pall Mall (2001) 208 CLR 516, 543-5 (per Gummow J). Retrieved from http://www.westlaw.com.au/maf/wlau/app/document?docguid=I99e28fdc9d6311e0a619d462427863b2&epos=1&tocDs=AUNZ_AU_JOURNALS_TOC&isTocNav=true&startChunk=1&endChunk=1

  Smyth, Russell. (1998). Academic writing and the courts: a quantitative study of the influence of legal and non-legal periodicals in the High Court. University of Tasmania Law Review, 17(2), 164–184. Retrieved from http://search.informit.com.au.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/documentSummary;dn=200004244;res=IELAPA

  Teoh v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1995) 183 CLR 273 at 288. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.westlaw.com.au/maf/wlau/app/document?docguid=Ia3e729f69d5d11e0a619d462427863b2&epos=1&tocDs=AUNZ_AU_JOURNALS_TOC&isTocNav=true&startChunk=1&endChunk=1

  Theunis Roux. (n.d.-b). Judging the Quality of Legal Research: A Qualified Response to the Demand for Greater Methodological Rigour. Legal Education Review, 24(2). Retrieved from http://search.informit.com.au.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/fullText;res=AEIPT;dn=206639

  Thomas, E. E. (1999). Fairness and Certainty in Adjudication: Formalism v Substantialism. Otago Law Review, 9(3), 459–488. Retrieved from http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/otago9&id=467

  Thomson Reuters, The Laws of Australia 25 Interpretation and Use of Legal Sources, ‘4 Judicial Statements’ [25.4.140] – [25.4.550]. (n.d.). In The Laws of Australia (p. [25.4.140]–[25.4.550]). WestlawAU. Retrieved from http://www.westlaw.com.au/maf/api/tocLocatorVM?ndd=1&qlink-label=2+Rules+of+Precedent&stid=std-anz-tocbrowse&originates-from-link=false&ao=o.AUNZ_AU_ENCYCLO_TOC%7C%7CI171f79cd1b7111e38f45ebd1ab56cac9&ntocview=I171f79cd1b7111e38f45ebd1ab56cac9&dsu=AUNZ_AU_ENAULAW&sortid=Product&tocguid=AUNZ_AU_ENCYCLO_TOC%7C%7CI171f79cd1b7111e38f45ebd1ab56cac9&searchds=AUNZ_SEARCHALL&productAO=AUNZ_TOC%7C%7Canzencycloproductautla

  Van Hoecke, M. (2011). Chapter 1: Legal Doctrine: Which Method(s) for What Kind of Discipline? pp. 1-18 In Methodologies of Legal Research: Which Kind of Method for What Kind of Discipline? (1st ed., Vol. European Academy of Legal Theory Series). Oxford: Hart Publishing Limited. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/qut/reader.action?docID=737251&ppg=17